Videosurgery
Basic skills for single-port robotic surgery
Luca Lambertini1-2, Matteo Pacini1, 3, Giulio Avesani1, 4, 5, Luca Morgantini1, John Smith1, Hakan Bahadir Haberal1, 6, Juan Ramon Torres-Anguiano1, Simone Crivellaro1
1Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
2Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence – Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
3Urology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
4Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
5Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
6Department of Urology, Ankara Ataturk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ministry of Health, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
Citation: Lambertini L, Pacini M, Avesani G, et al. Basic skills for single-port robotic surgery. www.ceju.online/journal/2024/robot-surgery-single-port-training-basic-skills-2390.php
Key Words: training • robot • surgery • single port • basic • skills

The worldwide spread of single-port (SP) robotic platforms poses a proctoring challenge in the urological panorama. Nevertheless, the available training programs are often expensive and time limited. In light of this, we sought to provide an everyday comprehensive and highly reproducible training model for developing basic skills in SP surgery.
All the most common urological SP procedures were assessed by one expert surgeon and a trainee. Then, each procedure was divided into different steps also identifying the basic skills that were necessary for its completion. Finally, different training modules were developed only using materials available in everyday practice. Overall, 16 SP procedures were gathered, and 5 basic skills were assessed as pivotal in their completion: 1) correct knowledge of the 3 different basic camera settings, 2) management of the camera adjust command and its orientation, 3) flexible camera use minimising the instrument collisions, 4) dexterity in handling objects also when wide movements are required, and 5) suture skills simulating a vescico-urethral anastomosis. Five training models were then developed and tested on surgerynaïve medical students at the University of Illinois Chicago in June 2024. Each module was designed including a theoretical explanation of task accomplishment, tips and tricks to enhance the practical learning, and the main deviations to avoid (also defining critical errors that lead to the module-failure): Step 1 – Camera setting, Step 2 – The Four Squares, Step 3 – Camera Control, Step 4 – Move the Blocks, and Step 5 – Circular Suture.
This training program with low-cost models allows the achievement of basic skills for single-port surgery in an easy and highly replicable way, thus supporting the worldwide adoption of the SP platforms in everyday surgical practice.

Article history
Submitted: 8 September, 2024
Accepted: 16 October, 2024
Published online: 24 December, 2024
doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.0161
Corresponding author
Luca Lambertini
email: l.lambertini7@gmail.com
Conflicts of interest:  The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
Current issue
Ahead of print
Issue: 2024
Vol. 77, No. 4 Vol. 77, No. 3 Vol. 77, No. 2 Vol. 77, No. 1
Issue: 2023
Vol. 76, No. 4 Vol. 76, No. 3 Vol. 76, No. 2 Vol. 76, No. 1
Issue: 2022
Vol. 75, No. 4 Vol. 75, No. 3 Vol. 75, No. 2 Vol. 75, No. 1
Issue: 2021
Vol. 74, No. 4 Vol. 74, No. 3 Vol. 74, No. 2 Vol. 74, No. 1
Issue: 2020
Vol. 73, No. 4 Vol. 73, No. 3 Vol. 73, No. 2 Vol. 73, No. 1
Issue: 2019
Vol. 72, No. 4 Vol. 72, No. 3 Vol. 72, No. 2 Vol. 72, No. 1
Issue: 2018
Vol. 71, No. 4 Vol. 71, No. 3 Vol. 71, No. 2 Vol. 71, No. 1
Issue: 2017
Vol. 70, No. 4 Vol. 70, No. 3 Vol. 70, No. 2 Vol. 70, No. 1
Issue: 2016
Vol. 69, No. 4 Vol. 69, No. 3 Vol. 69, No. 2 Vol. 69, No. 1
Issue: 2015
Vol. 68, No. 4 Vol. 68, No. 3 Vol. 68, No. 2 Vol. 68, No. 1
Issue: 2014
Vol. 67, No. 4 Vol. 67, No. 3 Vol. 67, No. 2 Vol. 67, No. 1
Issue: 2013
Vol. 66, No. 4 Vol. 66, No. 3 Vol. 66, No. 2 Vol. 66, No. 1
Issue: 2012
Vol. 65, No. 4 Vol. 65, No. 3 Vol. 65, No. 2 Vol. 65, No. 1
Issue: 2011
Vol. 64, No. 4 Vol. 64, No. 3 Vol. 64, No. 2 Vol. 64, No. 1
Issue: 2010
Vol. 63, No. 4 Vol. 63, No. 3 Vol. 63, No. 2 Vol. 63, No. 1
Issue: 2009
Vol. 62, No. 4 Vol. 62, No. 3 Vol. 62, No. 2 Vol. 62, No. 1
Loading...
Logo CEJU